The development of new energy vehicles has become the focus of attention in the automotive industry today. In recent years, under the policy subsidy, China's new energy automobile market can be described as "a very good situation." However, the fraudulent incident in the new energy auto industry that broke out earlier this year has caused the fast-growing new energy auto industry to be questioned. In the face of the status quo of the new energy automobile market in China, Yang Yusheng, an 84-year-old academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, expressed his concerns.
Chinese Academy of Engineering Yang Yusheng
Subsidy higher than production cost
From the beginning of the Shanghai World Expo, I have been paying attention to the price of electric vehicles in China. I went to Shanghai the year before the Shanghai World Expo. The bus number was 1.6 million. When it reached the end of the year, it rose to 1.9 million. The World Expo rose to 2.1 million at the beginning of the year. Three months before the opening of the Shanghai Expo, I went to Shanghai and it has risen to 2.6 million. In a year or so, the 12-meter pure electric bus rose by 1 million yuan. In the case of subsidy, the subsidy is still clear, and it is still going up.
So, why does a 12-meter pure electric bus sell 2.6 million? The high subsidies allow companies to chase the purest electric buses with the highest subsidies, and the state-owned bus companies have underwritten them. If the quality is not good, they need not scruples to sell them. Manufacturers do not want to reduce costs to meet the market, but deliberately raise the price of the car.
Businesses are following the subsidy baton. Most of the subsidies have become high profits for auto companies, and the government’s financial burden is too heavy, delaying the development of the industry; it has induced large scandals of fraudulent subsidies and “recoveryâ€. For 6 to 8 meters of commercial vehicles, the subsidy is much higher than the cost of the car. Selling a car and taking an invoice can get a subsidy. This is unreasonable.
Subsidy is not degraded and companies are unable to stand on their own
We have raised the price because of the high subsidies because of the government's underwriting. If you rely on the market, you must find ways to reduce costs and lower prices. This will make auto companies become the protagonists of the marketization of electric vehicles. This is the practice in California.
The current situation in our country is that it is difficult for non-subsidized enterprises to continue. It is difficult for companies to stand on their own without retreat. Businesses are very dependent and cannot stand on their own.
The high subsidies in recent years have cultivated some bad habits of some auto companies in China. Relying on high-subsidy habits and short-sighted immediate interests, do not consider long-term development, and do the habit of high-preparation, high-priced cars. Because of the high subsidies, especially subsidies are linked to the amount of batteries. The corporate profits of fuel vehicles are between 2% and 8%, while the profitability of electric vehicles is between 10% and 20% and even higher. These habits of car companies are not conducive to the development of the company, but also not conducive to the marketization of electric vehicles, must be changed in the process of market transition.
One-sided pursuit of cruising mileage is wrong
California's points system also has limitations:
First, it is based on cars sold only in California. It does not reflect the company's responsibility to sell the total number of fuel vehicles in the country.
Second, its score is 0.5 + 0.01 × pure electric mile. The longer the pure electric exercise course, the higher the score. The highest line is 4 points. Tesla can get this score and sell it, buying billions of dollars a year. But Tesla’s car received a fine in Singapore due to high power consumption, high energy consumption, and high emissions. Therefore, linking with pure electric mileage is a violation of the purpose of emission reduction. This is a wrong practice in California.
Third, linked to pure electric mileage, if used in coal-fired electricity in China, the result is to encourage double increase in emissions. After getting a few points, it can be sold to fuel vehicles, and once again encouraged to increase emissions. So it's double.
Fourth, zero-emissions points and some zero-emissions points are not interchangeable and are not biased towards settlement. In other words, each company must produce these two kinds of cars.
Fifth, both the responsibilities that companies must fulfill and the points that the company sells for electric cars are called “points†and are confusing.
Refer to California's points system, but you can't copy it. The emission of carbon dioxide from power generation in California in the United States is very small. The fuel economy of electric vehicles is in line with the emission reduction. China produces 70% of coal for power generation, and pure electric vehicles only consume a lot of carbon dioxide due to fuel economy and power consumption. The use of cars that consume large amounts of electricity adds to the carbon dioxide emissions.
I recently talked about BYD's E6. This car consumes 19.7 kWh of electricity, which is a very large amount of electricity. Therefore, we should promote the sales of vehicles that reduce fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions by linking up with the reduction of carbon emissions. We must not pursue long-range pure electric vehicles.
Deviation from lightweight development
It is now said that the “electrical consumption per ton of kilometers†should not exceed 13 KWH for subsidies. Gradually improve the continued course of models such as pure electric buses. There is a few words to say about this issue.
The weight of the vehicle is placed inside the denominator so that the heavier the car, the easier it is to reach the target. This is to encourage the use of carts and heavy cars.
To increase the driving range of pure electric buses, it is necessary to install more batteries. This is to encourage cars with high power consumption and high emissions. Just like BYD's 700 kilogram battery.
If such a threshold is raised, the direction in which electric vehicles deviate from lightweight development will run counter to the original intention of developing electric vehicles to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
There are face problems in the development of new energy vehicles
Small passenger vehicles use less materials, consume less electricity, have fewer batteries, and have low costs. If the impact of subsidized slope reduction is properly formulated, it will be easier to market. Therefore, we must update the concept, put energy-saving emission reduction in the first place, face the second place.
Face problem I explained that the masses think that the car is a symbol of identity and wealth. Another way is to think that on the street there are trolleys, and the entire city does not look good. Changan Automobile has a technical manager who discussed this issue with me at a meeting. It's ugly to say that all the cars are on the road and Europe sees it. This is also a face problem.
Subsidy is unfair to lead-acid batteries
The low-speed vehicles that have been marketed allow the use of lead-acid batteries. Electric vehicles using lead-acid batteries are not subsidized, and now lead-acid batteries have new technologies and the industry's rectification effect is also very significant. Therefore, we must treat lead-acidity fairly and do not think it is ancient and backward. In fact, lead-carbon batteries and special activated carbon solve the problem of anode negative acid saltation. Lead-rare earth alloys, lead-graphene alloys solve the problem of positive electrode grid corrosion. So, we used to be biased against lead-acid batteries.
In strict accordance with ISO 9001:20015 and Wind Power New Energy Flangs;
1.Make process card and quality plan
2.Choose the qualified raw material and do incoming test, not allowed
nonconforming material to enter into production process;
3.Producing and testing followed the quality documents
4.Be good at Quality records and product identification to ensure the product
traceability
5.Do the final inspection to ensure 100% of pass.
New Energy Flangs,Wind Power New Energy Flangs,Wind Power New Energy Flange Height,Wind Power New Energy Flange Weight
Shanxi Tianbao Group Co.,Ltd. , https://www.tbflange.com